Such
efforts are by no means new; sites like Ironbridge Gorge
in England, Engelsberg Ironworks in Sweden, and, in this
country, Sagus Iron works and Hopewell Furnace National
Historic Sties have long attracted the attention of historians,
archeologists and preservationists. What distinguishes
the current focus on industrial sites is an increase in
both the extent and the breadth of this interest. These
projects, in conjunction with more traditional preservation
and interpretive initiatives, have given rise to what
has been termed a ‘heritage industry’ (Hewison 1987)2.
Involvement of archeologists in such
projects will increasingly demand that we reflect on the role
we play in fashioning the view of the past that emerges from
these projects. While interest in the presentation of
archeological data to the public is by no means new to the
field, the new climate will necessitate that the issue be
accorded a more central role in our work-- and in our
thinking. Unlike traditional compliance and academically
oriented archeology, where the issue of public interpretation
is all to often an implicit rather than an explicit concern,
‘heritage’ projects thrust this issue to the forefront.
In recent years the National Park Service
has become involved in more than its share of these
initiatives. Some of these projects involve the creation of
new units within the Federal park system, while for others the
National Park Service has functioned in the role of technical
advisor to other organizations.
In this paper I will discuss aspects of two
such projects. In 1988 Congress created the Southwestern
Pennsylvania Heritage Preservation Commission under the
Department of the Interior. The Commission's mandate is to
develop partnerships between federal, state and local
governments, in cooperation with private entities, which share
an interest in the economic revitalization of a nine-county
region of southwestern Pennsylvania through the preservation
and interpretation of regional cultural and natural resources.
This broad and ambitious initiative, initially dubbed
America's Industrial Heritage Project and currently referred
to as the Path of Progress, is guided by the Commission, which
coordinates the efforts of its disparate partners. The
Commission’s specific mandate is the development of
facilities to interpret sites relating to coal mining, iron
and steel making, transportation, and allied industrial
themes.
|