|
|
|
But what does the
contrast between these two sets of features tell us? We
could attempt to explain this, and other alterations in
roundhouse design which occurred during the nineteenth
and twentieth centuries, by resort to that hackneyed phrase
"technological evolution". But this updated
gloss on the hopelessly Whiggish notion of "the march
of progress" hides more than it reveals. More usefully,
we can sketch out the changes in management practices
that accompanied the rationalization of business and the
search for efficiency as corporations attempted to survive
in an increasingly competitive environment.
I would suggest that while the latter
approach tells part of the story, it is only a partially
corrective. Concerted action by railroad workers, through
formal unions or direct action, plagued management. Railroaders
proved to be among the most restive segment of the labor
force. Even before the rise to prominence of the railroad
brotherhoods, the engineers, brakeman and mechanics had
demonstrated their determination to challenge management
prerogatives. The railroad general strike of 1877, spontaneous
and explosive, swept across the continent along the national
network of railroad lines. It took massive armed intervention,
and the full weight of the federal government, to suppress
this first truly national strike. In its wake millions
of dollars of railroad property lay a smoldering ruin,
and more than one hundred people lay dead. The events
of July, 1877, shook gilded age America to the core.
Details of the industrial plant, like
the changing pit construction noted here, must be placed
within the context of these larger social forces. The
struggles for control, both at the point of production
and in industrial communities at large, led employers
to make concessions which changed the face of the workplace.
Sometimes these concessions were wring from reluctant
management by organized unions, and sometimes they were
introduced in an effort to forestall organization. In
either case the evidence of the contentious nature of
industrial relations is written in the physical fabric
of America’s industrial sites.
|